|
© 2003. Sears & Associates. All
rights reserved
WHAT'S NEW! NEW SURVEY: WHY PARTNERS
LATERAL
We spoke to 54 partners and
8 practice groups currently contemplating moves to other firms
and asked:
Why are
you considering moving to another firm?
- 61% - I'm moving to escape firm
problems, politics or conditions. (Substantive, non-practice
issues)
- 39% - My firm is not offering
enough support, cross-selling opportunities or "image" to
grow my practice. (Substantive, practice
issues)
The results from our survey
revealed markedly different reasons from the two most commonly
held beliefs about why partners lateral. Common beliefs are:
1] the offer of a great opportunity and/or 2] more
money. Our survey showed that, while these two choices are by
far the most commonly given, these are seldom the real
reasons. Rather, they are the politically acceptable reasons.
We invite you to add your opinions to the poll on your right.
Next month we'll publish the combined results
anonymously. _________________________________________________
LATERAL
CHALLENGES REPLACING
A STAR RAINMAKER FINDING THE RIGHT LATERAL HAS BECOME THE
SUBJECT OF ENDLESS QUIZZES, BROMIDES AND MYTHS. THIS IS NO
LESS TRUE FOR THE LATERAL PARTNER SEEKING A NEW FIRM. BOTH
SIDES TEND TO APPROACH THE SELECTION PROCESS ON AN
OPPORTUNISTIC BASIS, I.E. THEY DEAL WITH IT IN TERMS OF WHO
IS, OR WHAT'S OUT THERE, INSTEAD OF ARRIVING AT IT BASED ON
THEIR OWN FOCUSED NEEDS. THIS SHORT STORY IS ABOUT THE KEY
ELEMENTS OF THOSE NEEDS AND HOW TO FOCUS THEM. WE INVITE YOU
TO READ IT, TAKE THE SURVEY AND CHECK BACK NEXT MONTH TO SEE
THE RESULTS.
It was just dawn
when the security guard unlocked the door for the three
partners going up to the firm's 12th floor conference room...
all of them right on time. Dinky thought, "Six a.m.,
this is barbaric." But he smiled at Miles, his
Practice Group Leader, and at Bill, the Managing Partner, and
said, "Thanks for the early invitation. Leaving home at 5 in
the morning sure helps me beat
traffic." Bill looked as
though he had been up all night. He didn't return Dinky's
smile as he said, "George's departure yesterday, leaves us in
a crisis. I doubt that he'll be back with us, or practice law,
ever again. As you know, he had a darn big practice and we not
only would like to keep it, but we owe his clients immediate
backup." Miles said, "Should
I tell him?" When Bill nodded yes,
Miles said, "What I'm about to say needs to stay in this room.
For the last two months we've had a very secret, intense
search underway, with an out of town recruiter who's extremely
discreet. The search is to replace George, because of our
early misgivings about his antics. We already have two
candidates... three if we include Brad. These are three hard
to find candidates, because George has such a practice. He's
like a member of his client's
management." Dinky was as amazed
by both the secret search and by their including Brad as a
candidate. When he
finally closed his dropped open jaw, Dinky said, "Look, I've
been a partner in this firm for 12 years. I like and admire
Brad and consider myself his good friend, but I think we would
be doing Brad, the Firm and our clients a disservice if we had
Brad take over George's practice. Brad's been here for fifteen
years, eight of them as a partner, and he's hardly ever
brought in a piece of business. In short, he's a nice guy, but
his rainmaking skills, as my kids would say...
suck." "That's why we did the
search." Miles said, "Let me tell you who the other two
candidates are. They both have great credentials... are both
at the right experience level and both have reasonable
compensation expectancies." Dinky
said, "They sound like Siamese twins. What's the difference
between them?" "There's one big
difference. The first guy, Ben Goodfellow, has some of the
best people skills I've ever seen. His practice shows that
because he's consistently had a book of about $2 million but
only bills about 1,200 hours himself, almost all of it to his
own clients." Dinky said, "In
short, everybody else does his
work." "That's one way to look at
it, but if you don't like that idea, the second guy, Norm
Strugolosi, will appeal to you. He's gradually built his book
up to about $500,000, but he bills a pretty consistent average
of 1,900 hours of his own time, about half of it on other
partner's matters." Dinky said,
"Wow, they sure are different. It seems like a choice between
two different practice philosophies. One is a big book, low
biller and the other a modest book, big biller. That kind of
begs the question as to who we are and what we believe."
We invite you to add you opinion to the poll at
your right. _________________________________________________ | |
|
|
ONLINE
PROGRAMMING RECRUITING AND RETAINING
LATERALS
If you’re the Managing Partner of a
firm facing lateral challenges or a lateraling partner with a
specific challenge, you’ve come to the right place to listen
to how others have solved similar problems – and, if you’re so
inclined, you can actually participate in our live sessions.
No planes to catch, no hotels away from home. Complete
anonymity. Hear industry leaders. Online. Interactive,
live programming. Programming, at your convenience.
We’ve partnered with WebEx
Communications, Inc., the world’s leading provider of Web
communications services, to deliver a comprehensive online
programming channel capable of supporting thousands of online
attendees. Once your law firm registers to participate in our
program, you’ll be able to participate from the conference
room, your office, from the road or at home – programming, at
your convenience. It’s your choice.
Two or three leading national
experts from the fields of rainmaking training, attorney
search and law firm management, will join us for each
interactive session. Before we finalize our schedule for the
next several months, we’d like your thoughts as to which
sessions you’d be most interested in attending or listening
to. We’ll say ”thank you” for participating in the survey, by
providing your firm with a 50% discount on the first program’s
registration – firm wide!
______________________________________
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS LATERAL CHALLENGES
Q I’ve been with the same firm for about
20 years; since I graduated from law school. I’m a partner now
with a substantial book of business. The culture has changed
so radically recently that I’m thinking seriously of leaving.
I’ve been on various management committees, but nothing seems
to help slow the internal fighting. Should I keep slugging it
out? Or just move on?
A Internal dissension in
a law firm is, as you know, not uncommon. Of course, like
everything else it comes in various intensities and levels. In
the last 3 years we’ve probably seen as many firms dissolve as
a result of internal dissension than in the preceding 10 years
combined. In addition to the extreme unpleasantness of such
dissension, the big risk is that the firm may break up as a
result. If you perceive that this could happen you should not
be the last one left to turn out the lights, which tends to be
extremely painful and expensive. Rather, take a look at the
issues about which people are polarized. Are they reparable?
If so, set a time limit (either by notice or unannounced), do
your best to cause it to cure and if it won’t, find a happy
home. ______________________________________
RESEARCH BOOZ ALLEN STUDY APPLICABLE TO
LATERALS
Getting to the real costs of law
firm strategic hiring decisions can be a challenge. The
law, as most professions, tries to hide its hiring mistakes.
As a result there is little data available. We can, however,
look to relevant studies of comparable positions to get
meaningful cost data. One such study is in print in the 3rd
quarter, 2002 issue of Booz Allen's publication,
"Strategy+Business" and/or available on their web site at
www.strategy-business.com.
This is a demonstration of the cost
of poor lateral selection. The Booz Allen Study shows an
astonishing average of a 24-fold difference from the worst
results to the best. The Study is based on actual
non-performing terminations of CEOs, but it appears to be
equally applicable to all levels of management in the firm
from Practice Group Leader to Managing Partner. This kind of
comparative data for closely held law firms is almost
impossible to come by, so the use of these results from the
study of publicly available data is critical.
The impressive depth of this study
of management, results from its survey of CEOs at 2,500 large,
publicly held companies. The 24 times performance difference
doesn’t even include costs associated with getting rid of poor
managers. They had to be replaced in approximately half the
time, which means twice as often, as regular transitions for
well performing management. _____________________________________ | |
|
THE MAKING OF A RAINMAKER
A SERIALIZATION
OF THE BOOK, ‘MAKING RAIN’
During the last two years, more
than 7,500 lawyers, worldwide have read ”Making Rain”. They’ve
answered the questions at the end of each chapter and, in the
process, many have learned why they can’t make enough
rain. Thousands have called us, hundreds have taken the
online questionnaire to test their rainmaking impediments and
many have emailed us to say "thank you, you changed my life,
I’m getting soaked by the rain.” The New York Law
Journal gave this review: “This book is recommended for anyone
who enjoys a good, fast paced story, and is a must-read for
anyone wishing to move up in the legal
profession.”
“Making Rain” is about Brad Talbot. Brad
is decent, bright, presentable, hard working and loyal. He
just can't seem to attract clients and, as a result, he's a
service partner … a good one, but without clients of his own.
Throughout the book, Brad faces the challenges of seeing
himself through his own eyes and those of his wife and
partners. By understanding how Brad solves his problem, many
lawyers have seen themselves more clearly. That's the key to
the success of “Making Rain”.
Each month we’ll deliver one
chapter of ”Making Rain” and five questions related to the
book’s characters and how they work out their rainmaking
issues. Since there are no ‘right or wrong answers’, we’ll
provide a commentary on how you demonstrate your own personal
rainmaking strengths and weaknesses. After you participate, I
guarantee that you’ll clearly see that "Making Rain" is about
you, not your partners, your firm, your marketing strategies
or your clients.
Download the first chapter of Making Rain
and its
questions. | |
|
|
© 2003. Sears &
Associates. All rights reserved.
Laterals is
published monthly by Sears & Associates, a national
attorney search firm since 1979.
About
Laterals and your subscription: Sears & Associates has selected the recipients of
this newsletter, which is published monthly, from among our
existing client base and others who have expressed an interest
in subject materials of the type contained in this periodical
newsletter. If for any reason you do not want to receive
this publication, click on the unsubscribe link below and we
will immediately remove your address from the mailing list.
Sears & Associates never shares e-mail addressees from our
list with any other party; we fully respect your
privacy.
Executive Editor:
Jerry Sears jerry@mentoringpros.com Publisher: Ellen Caravello
ellen@mentoringpros.com Copy Editor:
Judith Sanchez, Mentoring Pros, Inc. judy@mentoringpros.com ePublishing Manager: Deb
Daufeldt, Second Story Solutions, LLC deb@mentoringpros.com Technology Evangelist:
Mark Margaretten, Second Story Solutions, LLC
mark@mentoringpros.com WebMaster: Chris
Pelosi, e-techStrategies LLP webmaster@mentoringpros.com
Sears &
Associates EXPERTS IN THE REAL WORLD OF
LATERALING RAINMAKERS Delray Beach, FL USA (561)
638-4750 phone (561) 637-6585 fax Web Site: www.mentoringpros.com
| |
| |