© 2003. Sears & Associates. All rights reserved

WHAT'S NEW!
NEW SURVEY: WHY PARTNERS LATERAL

We spoke to 54 partners and 8 practice groups currently contemplating moves to other firms and asked:

Why are you considering
moving to another firm?

  • 61% - I'm moving to escape firm problems, politics or conditions. (Substantive, non-practice issues)
  • 39% - My firm is not offering enough support, cross-selling opportunities or "image" to grow my practice. (Substantive, practice issues)

The results from our survey revealed markedly different reasons from the two most commonly held beliefs about why partners lateral. Common beliefs are: 1] the offer of a great opportunity and/or  2] more money. Our survey showed that, while these two choices are by far the most commonly given, these are seldom the real reasons. Rather, they are the politically acceptable reasons. We invite you to add your opinions to the poll on your right. Next month we'll publish the combined results anonymously.
_________________________________________________

LATERAL CHALLENGES
REPLACING A STAR RAINMAKER

FINDING THE RIGHT LATERAL HAS BECOME THE SUBJECT OF ENDLESS QUIZZES, BROMIDES AND MYTHS. THIS IS NO LESS TRUE FOR THE LATERAL PARTNER SEEKING A NEW FIRM. BOTH SIDES TEND TO APPROACH THE SELECTION PROCESS ON AN OPPORTUNISTIC BASIS, I.E. THEY DEAL WITH IT IN TERMS OF WHO IS, OR WHAT'S OUT THERE, INSTEAD OF ARRIVING AT IT BASED ON THEIR OWN FOCUSED NEEDS. THIS SHORT STORY IS ABOUT THE KEY ELEMENTS OF THOSE NEEDS AND HOW TO FOCUS THEM. WE INVITE YOU TO READ IT, TAKE THE SURVEY AND CHECK BACK NEXT MONTH TO SEE THE RESULTS.

     It was just dawn when the security guard unlocked the door for the three partners going up to the firm's 12th floor conference room... all of them right on time. 
     Dinky thought, "Six a.m., this is barbaric."
     But he smiled at Miles, his Practice Group Leader, and at Bill, the Managing Partner, and said, "Thanks for the early invitation. Leaving home at 5 in the morning sure helps me beat traffic." 
     Bill looked as though he had been up all night. He didn't return Dinky's smile as he said, "George's departure yesterday, leaves us in a crisis. I doubt that he'll be back with us, or practice law, ever again. As you know, he had a darn big practice and we not only would like to keep it, but we owe his clients immediate backup." 
     Miles said, "Should I tell him?"
     When Bill nodded yes, Miles said, "What I'm about to say needs to stay in this room. For the last two months we've had a very secret, intense search underway, with an out of town recruiter who's extremely discreet. The search is to replace George, because of our early misgivings about his antics. We already have two candidates... three if we include Brad. These are three hard to find candidates, because George has such a practice. He's like a member of his client's management."
     Dinky was as amazed by both the secret search and by their including Brad as a candidate.  
     When he finally closed his dropped open jaw, Dinky said, "Look, I've been a partner in this firm for 12 years. I like and admire Brad and consider myself his good friend, but I think we would be doing Brad, the Firm and our clients a disservice if we had Brad take over George's practice. Brad's been here for fifteen years, eight of them as a partner, and he's hardly ever brought in a piece of business. In short, he's a nice guy, but his rainmaking skills, as my kids would say... suck."
     "That's why we did the search." Miles said, "Let me tell you who the other two candidates are. They both have great credentials... are both at the right experience level and both have reasonable compensation expectancies."
     Dinky said, "They sound like Siamese twins. What's the difference between them?"
     "There's one big difference. The first guy, Ben Goodfellow, has some of the best people skills I've ever seen. His practice shows that because he's consistently had a book of about $2 million but only bills about 1,200 hours himself, almost all of it to his own clients."
     Dinky said, "In short, everybody else does his work."
     "That's one way to look at it, but if you don't like that idea, the second guy, Norm Strugolosi, will appeal to you. He's gradually built his book up to about $500,000, but he bills a pretty consistent average of 1,900 hours of his own time, about half of it on other partner's matters."
     Dinky said, "Wow, they sure are different. It seems like a choice between two different practice philosophies. One is a big book, low biller and the other a modest book, big biller. That kind of begs the question as to who we are and what we believe." 

We invite you to add you opinion to the poll at your right.

_________________________________________________

April 2003

YOU BE THE JUDGE

The following questions relate to the stories on the left.  Answer as many questions as you'd like and at the end of this column, click "Submit" just once to record your responses.  Check back next month to see the compiled anonymous results.

Q Why do you think partners make lateral moves?
They want to grow their books, but don’t have the time.
They want better compensation plans.
They want origination credit.
They want to escape their firm’s problems and/or politics.
The firm provides inadequate support for growing their practice.
They want to reduce financial risk from current management.

 

 

 

The following questions relate to the stories on the left.  Answer as many questions as you'd like and at the end of this column, click "Submit" just once to record your responses.

Q Which candidate would you choose?
Brad Talbert
- George’s clients know Brad and they need continuity to stay with the firm. (and/or)
- Even though Brad’s not a rainmaker, the firm will help him improve his skills. (and/or)
- Brad’s put in the time and deserves to be given George’s clients.
Ben Goodfellow
- His client base is attractive and it can offset some loss of George’s clients. (and/or)
- He’s a good rainmaker, so George’s clients will probably like him.
Norm Strugolosi
- He knows how to balance his practice between origination and service work. (and/or)
- He’ll be able to satisfy George’s clients.
I wouldn’t participate in the poll because the story is far too simplistic and I don’t have enough facts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following questions relate to the stories on the left.  Answer as many questions as you'd like and at the end of this column, click "Submit" just once to record your responses.

Q Which topics would be of greatest interest to you for Online Programming?
Improving Rainmaking Skills
Retaining good laterals
Growing a firm with laterals
Lateral due diligence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following questions relate to the stories on the left.  Answer as many questions as you'd like and at the end of this column, click "Submit" just once to record your responses.

Q A successful partner should leave a firm with substantial internal conflict, all things being equal, within:
6 months
12 months
18 months
24 months
30 months

 

 

 

 

 

The following questions relate to the stories on the left.  Answer as many questions as you'd like and at the end of this column, click "Submit" just once to record your responses.

Q Data from professional environments other than the law isn’t generally acceptable to the private practice of law.

Q A 24-fold difference in results from the best to the worst isn’t possible.

Q Needing to replace the poor performing lateral in half the time of a normal replacement isn’t realistic. The replacement time would ordinarily be longer.

 

 

 

 

The following questions relate to the stories on the left.  Answer as many questions as you'd like and at the end of this column, click "Submit" just once to record your responses.

Q After reading Making Rain, do you believe that relationships such as Janet really exist?

Q If you took the MAKING RAIN ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE after reading the book, did you feel that the report you received was:

The results of this survey will be published next month.
 
This survey is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those readers who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent opinions of readers in general, nor the profession as a whole.

ONLINE PROGRAMMING
RECRUITING AND RETAINING LATERALS

If you’re the Managing Partner of a firm facing lateral challenges or a lateraling partner with a specific challenge, you’ve come to the right place to listen to how others have solved similar problems – and, if you’re so inclined, you can actually participate in our live sessions. No planes to catch, no hotels away from home. Complete anonymity.  Hear industry leaders. Online. Interactive, live programming. Programming, at your convenience.

We’ve partnered with WebEx Communications, Inc., the world’s leading provider of Web communications services, to deliver a comprehensive online programming channel capable of supporting thousands of online attendees. Once your law firm registers to participate in our program, you’ll be able to participate from the conference room, your office, from the road or at home – programming, at your convenience. It’s your choice. 

Two or three leading national experts from the fields of rainmaking training, attorney search and law firm management, will join us for each interactive session. Before we finalize our schedule for the next several months, we’d like your thoughts as to which sessions you’d be most interested in attending or listening to. We’ll say ”thank you” for participating in the survey, by providing your firm with a 50% discount on the first program’s registration – firm wide!

______________________________________

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
LATERAL CHALLENGES

Q I’ve been with the same firm for about 20 years; since I graduated from law school. I’m a partner now with a substantial book of business. The culture has changed so radically recently that I’m thinking seriously of leaving. I’ve been on various management committees, but nothing seems to help slow the internal fighting. Should I keep slugging it out? Or just move on?

A Internal dissension in a law firm is, as you know, not uncommon. Of course, like everything else it comes in various intensities and levels. In the last 3 years we’ve probably seen as many firms dissolve as a result of internal dissension than in the preceding 10 years combined. In addition to the extreme unpleasantness of such dissension, the big risk is that the firm may break up as a result. If you perceive that this could happen you should not be the last one left to turn out the lights, which tends to be extremely painful and expensive. Rather, take a look at the issues about which people are polarized. Are they reparable? If so, set a time limit (either by notice or unannounced), do your best to cause it to cure and if it won’t, find a happy home. 
______________________________________

RESEARCH
BOOZ ALLEN STUDY APPLICABLE TO LATERALS

Getting to the real costs of law firm strategic hiring decisions can be a challenge.  The law, as most professions, tries to hide its hiring mistakes. As a result there is little data available. We can, however, look to relevant studies of comparable positions to get meaningful cost data. One such study is in print in the 3rd quarter, 2002 issue of Booz Allen's publication, "Strategy+Business" and/or available on their web site at www.strategy-business.com.

This is a demonstration of the cost of poor lateral selection. The Booz Allen Study shows an astonishing average of a 24-fold difference from the worst results to the best. The Study is based on actual non-performing terminations of CEOs, but it appears to be equally applicable to all levels of management in the firm from Practice Group Leader to Managing Partner. This kind of comparative data for closely held law firms is almost impossible to come by, so the use of these results from the study of publicly available data is critical.

The impressive depth of this study of management, results from its survey of CEOs at 2,500 large, publicly held companies. The 24 times performance difference doesn’t even include costs associated with getting rid of poor managers. They had to be replaced in approximately half the time, which means twice as often, as regular transitions for well performing management.
_____________________________________

THE MAKING OF A RAINMAKER
A SERIALIZATION OF THE BOOK, ‘MAKING RAIN’

During the last two years, more than 7,500 lawyers, worldwide have read ”Making Rain”. They’ve answered the questions at the end of each chapter and, in the process, many have learned why they can’t make enough rain.  Thousands have called us, hundreds have taken the online questionnaire to test their rainmaking impediments and many have emailed us to say "thank you, you changed my life, I’m getting soaked by the rain.”  The New York Law Journal gave this review: “This book is recommended for anyone who enjoys a good, fast paced story, and is a must-read for anyone wishing to move up in the legal profession.”

“Making Rain” is about Brad Talbot. Brad is decent, bright, presentable, hard working and loyal. He just can't seem to attract clients and, as a result, he's a service partner … a good one, but without clients of his own. Throughout the book, Brad faces the challenges of seeing himself through his own eyes and those of his wife and partners. By understanding how Brad solves his problem, many lawyers have seen themselves more clearly. That's the key to the success of “Making Rain”.

Each month we’ll deliver one chapter of ”Making Rain” and five questions related to the book’s characters and how they work out their rainmaking issues. Since there are no ‘right or wrong answers’, we’ll provide a commentary on how you demonstrate your own personal rainmaking strengths and weaknesses. After you participate, I guarantee that you’ll clearly see that "Making Rain" is about you, not your partners, your firm, your marketing strategies or your clients.

Download the first chapter of Making Rain and its questions.
 

© 2003. Sears & Associates. All rights reserved.

Laterals is published monthly by Sears & Associates, a national attorney search firm since 1979.

About Laterals and your subscription:
Sears & Associates has selected the recipients of this newsletter, which is published monthly, from among our existing client base and others who have expressed an interest in subject materials of the type contained in this periodical newsletter.  If for any reason you do not want to receive this publication, click on the unsubscribe link below and we will immediately remove your address from the mailing list. Sears & Associates never shares e-mail addressees from our list with any other party; we fully respect your privacy.

Executive Editor: Jerry Sears jerry@mentoringpros.com 
Publisher: Ellen Caravello
ellen@mentoringpros.com 
Copy Editor: Judith Sanchez, Mentoring Pros, Inc.
judy@mentoringpros.com
ePublishing Manager: Deb Daufeldt, Second Story Solutions, LLC
deb@mentoringpros.com
Technology Evangelist: Mark Margaretten, Second Story Solutions, LLC
mark@mentoringpros.com
WebMaster: Chris Pelosi, e-techStrategies LLP
webmaster@mentoringpros.com

Sears & Associates
EXPERTS IN THE REAL WORLD OF LATERALING RAINMAKERS
Delray Beach, FL USA
(561) 638-4750 phone
(561) 637-6585 fax
Web Site:
www.mentoringpros.com